« February 2007 | Main | April 2007 »

March 2007

March 27, 2007

What is USPAP and Why Should I Care?

Appraisal experts operate in differing fields of expertise (discipline) including Real Property, Business Valuation, Personal Property and Machinery and Equipment. Occasionally, there are misunderstandings regarding the appraiser’s function within an appraisal assignment.

 I periodically receive calls from prospective clients who state: “I need an appraisal and I need the value to be $fill in the blank. My response to them is always the same, “I’m sorry, but that’s not what I do.” This is why.

 In 1987 The Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice or USPAP as authorized by the US Congress were established in order to promote and preserve the public trust. Prior to that time, the appraisal profession had come under intense scrutiny during what has come to be known as “the S&L Crisis.” This crisis was in great part the result of several factors including; pressure from lenders to deliver anticipated results, appraisers accepting contingency or undisclosed fees, a financial interest in property being appraised or reporting a predetermined result in favor of a client. UPSAP as adopted by both the Federal and all State governments raises the bar on ethical behavior, impartiality and professional competence of all appraisers.

 USPAP defines an appraisal as “an opinion of value” and requires that an appraiser be unbiased and impartial. The use of the word “opinion” is crucial since there are several methodologies or approaches an appraiser may employ and the appraiser must be free to choose which of these best serves any specific appraisal assignment.

 The impartiality of the appraiser is tantamount to the entire appraisal process. The value conclusions of any appraiser must be his own and independently derived. Clients are always free to discuss their thoughts on the process, but in the end, the appraiser is legally bound to avoid any undue influence in order to arrive at a fair result, especially where third parties are concerned.

 A third party is defined as anyone who may be affected by an appraisal result. Common examples are; banks and financial institutions in collateral lending situations, parties in property settlement cases including divorce or partnership buyouts, insured or insurers in loss claims or the public at large in eminent domain or property tax assessment appeals.

 In order to avoid even the presumption of bias, USPAP requires that appraisers certify the following in their reports;

         1.  There  is no present or prospective interest in the property being appraised.

        2.  There is no personal bias with respect to the parties or property involved.

        3.  The engagement was not contingent upon developing a predetermined result.

        4.  The compensation is not contingent upon developing a predetermined result.

 All real property appraisers are licensed by the states where they practice and as a condition of their license, compliance with USPAP is mandatory. Unfortunately, there are no licensing requirements for the other appraisal disciplines.  Regardless of the property type you need appraised, make certain the appraiser complies with USPAP. Your project and your organization deserve nothing less.

March 02, 2007

For What It's Worth

Appraisal experts operate in differing fields of expertise including Real Property, Business Valuation, Personal Property and Machinery and Equipment. There are frequent misunderstandings regarding the appraiser’s function within an appraisal assignment.

 One of the most frequently requested value concepts is “Fair Market Value”. This concept is best described as; “the most likely result of a sale between a willing buyer and seller, in an arms length transaction, both knowledgeable of all facts.”

 A key element in this definition is “most likely result.” The only true indicator of value is an actual sale. Since most appraisals are performed prior to a sale, it is rare for an appraisal to reflect the final selling price of a property. The appraiser relies upon his research of market data reflecting several sales of same or comparable property in order to arrive at a value conclusion. In comparison the final selling price of a property has likely been subject to negotiation based upon a number of factors including emotion.

  Imagine a garage sale with a stereo for sale at $200. A buyer offers $100. After some negotiation, both parties agree to $150. One could say the fair market value of the stereo is $150. However, over the next few weeks, two of the same or comparable stereos sell for $125 and $250 each. This difference in price could be related to several factors including: the negotiating skill of the parties, the operating and physical condition of each stereo, the motivation of the buyer or seller, the inclusion or lack of advertising, even the weather may play a part.

 An appraiser must research and consider all these factors before arriving at any value conclusion. This is why “most likely result” is often employed because no one can take all possible factors of a sale into account. 

 There are any number of varying appraisal values that may be employed including; Replacement Cost New, Fair Market Value In Continued Use, Orderly Liquidation Value, Forced Liquidation Value, Salvage Value and Insurance Replacement Cost. These are just a few examples of appraisal values. The unique circumstances of each individual situation will determine the value concept to be employed. A certified professional appraiser can assist in the determination of the best approach and value concept to be employed. 

 In a future posting, I will more fully explain the definitions of appraisal values and how each can be best employed.